Kritik und Anregungen » lax ICC testing. Now he wants to prov

CHICAGO -- Dwyane Wade believes that superteams are great for the NBA.The Chicago Bulls guard made the declaration during a 20-minute, post-practice media session in which he hit on a variety of different topics regarding the past and present of free agency.Wade -- who welcomed LeBron James and Chris Bosh to the Miami Heat in 2010 -- was asked if he thought the creation of super teams was good for the overall health of the league.I think certain moments -- its great, Wade said. At the end of the day, whether you dislike the Heat or you loved the Heat, you was tuning in to watch the Heat, right? Same thing with Golden State. Whether you dislike what happened with Kevin Durant or whatever the case may be, youre going to tune into watch, whether you want him to succeed or fail.Our game is growing. Eyes are on our game. And at the end of the day, me as a player, I just love the fact that players have the ability to control their own destiny.Thats what we fight for when it comes to lockouts and all these things. We want to be able to do the things we want to be able to do because they can trade us at any moment, they can get rid of us at any moment. So to have the power to be able to do what we did in 2010 -- that felt great. That was a great moment for us. Three young African-American kids got an opportunity to control their own destiny and call their own shots. Thats what we wanted. So our game is not taking a hit; our game has only grown.When the Heat trio was deciding where to play, Wade knew the process was altering the course of basketball history.?James, Wade and Bosh went on to lead Miami to four consecutive NBA Finals and won the championship twice.We definitely knew it was big, Wade said. We knew it was real big. Obviously, we knew we had to win to really make it something. But we knew that we were embarking on something big. Obviously, you dont know exactly what it is, and we wont know probably for years from now. But I think we all had an idea that this is about to be huge.Not all NBA players agree superteams are good, in the wake of Durants decision to leave the?Oklahoma City Thunder for the Golden State Warriors.Im an old-school guy. Im a competitor. ... When you want to be the best, youve got to beat the best, Los Angeles Clippers forward Paul Pierce, who is embarking on his 19th season,?told SiriusXM NBA Radio. Thats always been something thats driven me. Todays day and age, a lot of these guys are friends. Thats like if [Larry] Bird decided to go play with Magic [Johnson] or something. These guys, I think the competition makes the game what is.And Oklahoma, I felt like, was a contending team. They had Golden State on the ropes [in the Western Conference finals]. I understand when you have great players on losing teams who are tired of losing, struggling in the playoffs every year. Youre the lone star. Ive been in that position. I could have left Boston years ago, but I stuck it out [and won a championship in 2008]. I just feel like when youre that close, as a competitor, you dont go join the team that just put you out.Thats just me personally, but were living in a day and time where theres a new generation. ... I dont think they are as hungry or competitive as my generation was, and thats why youll probably see more of that.Wade said that when the NBA lockout occurred in 2011, he took it personally when owners took issue with teams being constructed like the Heat.We felt they tried to block us from being able to keep it going, Wade said. But they didnt do a good job of that -- obviously.Wade said the criticism the Heat faced early on was a challenge.That first year was a tough year for us, he said. Youve got guys who at that time had been in this league, and fans love. Media wasnt too bad on us either. And everything turned because we decided to play together.From a competitive standpoint you love that it was sold out every time you go to the arena, but just the things that people had to say about us deciding to play the game of basketball together -- there was a lot of negative attention on that. We took the hit of that.Wade compared the pressure and expectations the Heat dealt with to what other players have dealt with through the years.Just like Allen Iverson took the hit for tattoos and braids and headbands, Wade continued. Everyone does it now. So we understood what we were embarking on, and thats why it was huge because we knew we were ... Im not saying we were the first to do it, because I know other teams have tried to, but in the point of where we was name-wise in our career, in the prime of our career, we were the most powerful to do it at that time.But hey, we did what we wanted to do and thats what it always came back to us. After that first year, thats when we got back to playing the game, enjoying the game, whatever comes with it. When it became, We came together to win championships, lets take care of business.Wade said that the theory that he and Heat president Pat Riley started putting together the plan to make the Miami superteam a reality in 2008 was stupid.That theory is crazy, Wade said. So I would play for two seasons, and may get hurt, but lets hope that this happens in two years?I wish we was that smart, he added. Thank you for the credit, thank you for giving us credit of seeing in the future. We knew what the money was going to be like, we knew that the Miami Heat would have money. It makes no sense. How did we know the Heat could get three players? How did we have an idea in 2006, or whenever they said we came up with this plan, that the Miami Heat was going to be able to do this?I never thought that it would be possible, Wade said of teaming up with James. But when it presented itself, you open it up, you start the conversation, you start looking at it a little different, and thats what happened. So thank everybody for thinking we were that smart, but this is something that kind of happened when it happened.The Warriors now have four All-Stars: Durant,?Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson and Draymond Green. As for how Golden State will handle being the leagues new superteam, Wade wasnt sure.I have no idea, he said. Everything is different. I cant say it will or it wont be. With every team when you add a new piece, when you add new players, its going to be a moment where you have to adjust to each other. But theyre so good, who knows if the growing pains are going to be seen by anybody.We can all nitpick at whats going to be different, but at the end of the day you wont know until the end of the season. For us, we had a lot of growing pains, but at the end of the day we were in the Finals in our first year of playing together. We were just great talent. We werent the team we needed to be [yet], but we were still in the Finals. So you just never know.Sione Takitaki Youth Jersey . The Vancouver coach and an announced sellout crowd of 18,910 watched in dismay as the Canucks lost 7-4 to the New York Islanders on Monday night by squandering a 3-0 lead in the third period. Cleveland Browns Jerseys . -- If this was Aaron Gordons final home game at Arizona, and it almost certainly was, then he went out in style. http://www.footballbrownsnflprostore.com/Youth-Jim-Brown-Elite-Jersey/ . By having more great seasons. Manning was the only unanimous choice for the 2013 Associated Press NFL All-Pro team Friday. Jim Brown Browns Jersey . Jon Montgomerys gold medal in skeleton at the Whistler Sliding Centre and his subsequent auctioning off of a pitcher of beer in the village square elevated him to folk-hero status. Sione Takitaki Jersey . A forerunning sled crashed into the worker Thursday at the Sanki Sliding Center. The unidentified worker broke both legs and was airlifted to a nearby hospital.For 13 years between 1995 and 2008, Pakistan had three quality spin bowlers. Danish Kaneria was a workhorse who occasionally bolted for glory. Saqlain Mushtaq was an inventor and a world-class offspin bowler, and Mushtaq Ahmed was an illusionist. Together in their careers, they took 654 wickets at 32.On the 29th of December 1995, an 18-year-old from Faisalabad played his maiden List A game in the Willis King Cup against Habib Bank Limited. He bowled against Javed Miandad and took 1 for 32 off his nine overs. His first-class debut was a year later - he took the wicket of Imran Tahir and three others in his first innings.But he was not knocking on the door. In his first six first-class seasons he took 53 wickets. In List A he was just as underused and unsuccessful. In 2003-04 he took 42 wickets at 19. That year he began to believe.It took four years from then before Pakistan, at the urging of Misbah-ul-Haq, believed as well. His first match after his 13-year-wait was an ODI against India. He bowled in the death overs, took a wicket, and a year later, most people who saw him bowl believed in him.****Saeed Ajmal is one of six* men in history to take over 100 Test wickets despite starting after the age of 30. At one stage he was averaging 17 in Pakistans Test wins and 19 in ODI wins. In his first 35 Tests he took ten five-fors and four ten-wicket hauls. The rest of Pakistans attack took six five-wicket hauls. He dominated Test bowling and ODI bowling in an era when most bowlers specialised in one format.He was something special. England had done research into how fast spin was better than slow spin. Their batsmen had already proved that theory before science could be involved.Ajmal was a natural spin-bowling athlete who demanded wickets. Most spin bowlers take their wickets one at a time, working out the batsmens weakness and then moving them into a position where they jump into the trap. Ajmal wasnt like that. He was more of a predator spin bowler. He was dangerous to almost all batsmen, had natural gifts, and when he took wickets, they came by the bagful.Part of that is because most of Ajmals career has been played during the time of T20. Abdul Qadir would spend two hours setting up a batsman; Ajmal has two balls to set up his kill.There isnt much menace in his run-up. It is like every part-time offspinner you have faced in a club game - eager and unthreatening. The menace all starts with the pause at the crease. It is the offspinners version of Wes Halls leap to the wicket. It is the moment where time stops still and you get to think about what is about to happen.You will face one of the best bowlers in modern cricket, a man completely on top of his game, who knows how to get the best out of most surfaces, who can beat you by spinning the ball either way, or making it jump up, and it will all happen without much chance of any error on his part, at a speed that offspinners barely touch with the regular deliveries, and the ball will zip past you at will.And this isnt part of some bigger plan to get you out in 30 minutes. He thinks he can get you out this ball, and when he unfurls himself from his power pause, you start to believe it as well.At his best Ajmal believed that batsmen were afraid to look him in the eye. From 2008 to 2014, he was probably right about that.****Tony Lock was called for chucking in 1954 and Sonny Ramadhin wore long sleeves in his career as camouflage. Offspinners with illegal actions are hardly a new story.But in their era, a call for chucking (more often for fast bowlers) could be the end of a career. Jack Marsh and Eddie Gilbert, two talented indigenous Australian bowlers, both tried to prove they werent chuckers, but no one wanted to listen, and neither ever played for Australia. Ian Meckiff lost an entire career after being called in a Test. Mostly bowlers just disappeared, many before they ever even made it to the top level. Forget a fair trial or any trials. Forget science. There was just non-selection and sniggering.There will be a time in the future when that sort of treatment looks insane. One day there may be a time when a bowler is rightfully called for a no-ball on the field for bowling an illegal delivery, and there is no kerfuffle. We are not quite there yet. Science and due process were brought in for Muttiah Muralitharan, and that has been an improvement to our game. But the stigma and the accusations still exist.If Ajmals action was ever going to be called, Australia was the most likely opponent to stir it up. No country has been harsher with alleged chuckers than Australia (with their own and the opposition ones). Before Murali was called in Melbourne, Victorian bowler Troy Corbetts career was finished despite his List A bowling average of 10.In 2009, Australia were playing Pakistan in the UAE and were handling Ajmal quite well (he took no more wickets than Andrew Symonds or Michael Clarke). But they werent handling his doosra well. Pakistan claimed that Shane Watson had, after being dismissed, told Symonds (who was next to the umpire) that he believed Ajmal was chucking. Soon after, the ICC came to look at him.Those tests would clear his action.In 2012, the rumours would resurface when he played England and was unplayable. Again it was his doosra that was questioned. The funny thing with Ajmals doosra is that so many players privately have claimed he chucked it, and yet when they were out on the field, they didnt seem to see it at all.By 2014 he was taking close to a third of Pakistans wickets in the UAE. He was easily one of the top three bowlers in the world, but his action was different. This wasnt a rumour campaign. Stuart Broads tweets werent responsible. Even privately, Ajmals team-mates were worried about his elbow. And it was at the worst possible time, as the ICC decided to crack down on fingerspinners and their actions. Whether the timing was right (just before a World Cup) or not, Ajmals action had degraded badly and was almost twice the legal limit.He had to be suspended from cricket. Some argued of a conspiracy among the big three. Others claimed that he was too exciting a cricketer to be suspended from the game. But no matter how exciting he may have been, his action had fallen apart. It was illegal and it needed to be fixed.****Saeed Ajmal was the worlds No. 1 bowler. He was Wisden Indias Cricketer of the Year. He was a star. Ajmal had won a World T20, taken Sachin Tendulkars wicket in a World Cup semi-final, and then joked that he had forced Tendulkar to retire from ODIs. And in December 2014, to prove he could still bowl well, he played for Pakistan A against Kenya.Ajmal didnt play for Pakistan A lightly. He did it because he was desperate to prove that he could play in the World Cup in a few months time. That he was still the man for Pakistan. He took one wicket, a ball pitched outside leg stump that was swept to a fielder. His action still looked illegal but also a bit muted.Ajmal decided a week later not to play in the World Cup. There was talk just before the tournament that he might make a sudden comeback. He told Pakpassion, If my country needs me, then I will play in the World Cup. They decided they didnt need him. With him, Pakistan were going to struggle to win. Without him, they were never going to get close.****After clearing the ICC tests and remodelling his action, Ajmal returned to play a three-ODI series against Bangladesh. He was nervous, more nervous than during his debut against India. He wasnt sure he had successfully remodelled his action, and he wasnt sure he was completely in control of it. He knew everyone would be watching to see if he could still do this.Ajmal was dropped after the second ODI. In the first, he was taken for 74 runs in ten wicketless overs. All the other front-line bowlers went at less than six an over.A week later he played in the T20 match against Bangladesh. His last delivery was a full and wide ball that Shakib Al Hasan smacked away to win Bangladesh the game. Ajmal has not bowled a ball for Pakistan since.****In 2014, at the full height of his wicket-taking ability and the height of what was a degraded illegal action, Ajmal took 63 first-class wickets in nine matches for Worcester to help them get promoted to division one.In 2015, after his action and world had fallen apart, he took 16 wickets at 55. His second-last game had him bowling 29 wicketless overs for 112 runs. In his last match he went for 114 in 32 overs. Thaat was the last first-class game he played.ddddddddddddThat same year Yasir Shah played seven Tests and took 49 wickets.Those who saw Ajmal bowl in England saw a slow old man bowling with a low action, and the local scribes described him as bowling like a standard English county spinner. They did not mean it as a compliment.Despite that, he still bowled well for Worcestershire in the T20 - 21 wickets at 16.6. For a typical spinner that would have been a good summer, but Ajmal is not compared to common spinners. He is compared to himself, and as batsmen around the world found out in his glory years, that is a hard guy to take on.In the first Pakistan Super League, he was selected based on his services to Pakistan cricket. He was okay. There was one good wicket, against James Vince, and his economy rate held up. One of his great skills has always been knowing exactly where batsmen want to hit him and how to stop them from doing that. In an era when many inside T20 believe spinners should only spin the ball away from batsmen (see MS Dhonis entire recent captaincy for proof), Ajmal and his barely reconstructed action have survived well even spinning the ball into right-handers. But you dont expect Ajmal to survive. You expect him to eat you alive.As he told ESPNcricinfo earlier this year, batsmen used to be afraid to look him in the eye; now they stare back.****There was no party for Ajmal at the SSC in 2014. He took four wickets in the match but Sri Lanka won what was a going-away party for Mahela Jayawardene. What no one knew then, and perhaps we still dont know, is whether that game was the last Test for not just Jayawardene but also Ajmal.Ajmal is desperate to play another. I am available for all formats, he says. And he has done everything he can do to get back to top-level cricket. He has worked with Saqlain Mushtaq and Mohammad Akram at the National Cricket Academy, biomechanist Dr Paul Hurrion, Steve Rhodes, his coach at Worcester, and he has the support of the PCB. Between April 28 and August 25 this year, he played no top-level cricket. Instead he has been learning, going to the gym and practising new technical skills. He went back to club cricket. He started thinking about himself as a young boy and tried to re-train himself like you would a teenager.He claims to have been bowling 250 balls some days in practice - 41.4 overs a day. At the age of 39. In all, he claims to have bowled well over 13,000 deliveries. Some professionals of his age have been retired for years. Other players with his personality and level of fame would have slipped into a commentary or coaching gig. Instead he works and works to get back to where he was.He loves cricket. He feels younger than I am and he doesnt want to stop playing. It took him 13 years to make it the first time. He is willing to try even harder now to get back.You can question his new action and his results, but you cannot question his desire. He wants to play for Pakistan again. He wants to be the worlds No. 1 bowler again.****The PSL might have taken Pakistan by storm, but such is the nature of T20 cricket these days that it is not the only T20 competition in Pakistan. The National T20 Cup, a smaller, non-franchise event that doesnt quite get the same airtime, has just been completed. But for Ajmal, every chance is the last chance. He has one more PSL contract, but a player like him would expect to play not just in the PSL but in all the leagues around the world. If he wants to continue to play at the top level, for a county or a franchise, it will depend on his current form, not his pre-2015 form. At his age, with his recent history, cricket is cold-hearted and will forget him as quickly as it fell for him.But there is a photo of Ajmal that he just tweeted. It includes the watermark from the International Cricket Association - a cricket non-profit that helped him change his action, and now also wants to help other Pakistan domestic bowlers overcome illegal bowling actions. Behind the logo is him sitting in his Karachi Blue uniform with his newish Misbah-like beard, giving a two-finger point at an enormous cup. He might have won bigger tournaments before, but perhaps none have ever been tougher for him. The look on his face shows his pride.During the tournament, you could see that Ajmal has a lower action. But often now by choice, depending on the batsman and situation, in some ways he looks like Saeed Ajmal right until he arrives at the crease, and then a different, less vicious bowler arrives. His front arm doesnt crunch the back of his head like it used to in a power move. The arm is never as high as at his peak, which means less overspin, and while the odd ball still skips off the surface, it doesnt happen every delivery, as it did at his best.Because of all that, batsmen arent afraid to look him in the eye anymore. But to someone like Ajmal, a man with a will to win, that just makes the challenge all the more fun. He isnt coming at them now. He waits for them to come at him. And every wicket is a victory for the hard work he has put in.The real story behind that picture is that he took 20 wickets at 11 with an economy rate of 6.28. And with those wickets, he believes again.****When Ajmal said I am available for all formats, he added, And I am effective in all formats. The best players make big statements like this. They believe in themselves when no one else does. But Ajmal hasnt always believed. At one point he had to be convinced by Saqlain to keep trying to come back. He wasnt a believer when he bowled against Bangladesh, or for Worcestershire.This was a man who had to forget 22 years of the same action and relearn the art that made him the best bowler in the world. A man who went back to club cricket and was hit for sixes by amateurs. A man who described his comeback against Bangladesh as: I was scared in my heart. A man who had 178 Test wickets at 28 became nervous about bowling on TV.A few fast bowlers have had to change their bodies and actions in their careers completely, like Dennis Lillee, the poster boy for such a situation. But Lillee did it when he was young, not at the end of his career. What Ajmal is hoping to do has never been done by a top international spinner - a star for your country with two completely different actions, the second one when you are a year away from your 40th birthday.It has been more than two years since his last Test, almost 18 months since his last games for Pakistan, and yet he believes in himself as much now as he did when he was tearing international teams apart. He now talks about his time out of the game as his learning time. All that extra work that a bowler of his talent never has to do has made him a smarter bowler. Working on his cricket has taught him so much more about the game than he ever could have learnt just playing it.He believes he still has a doosra, a top-class offspinner and a host of new tricks, and he wants to show Pakistan, the world and himself that he can still do them.There was a fan who brought in a sign to one of his matches years ago that said: Saeed, the scientist of spin. While he has always been a smart bowler, for years much of what he did was because of his natural physical attributes and lax ICC testing. Now he wants to prove he can still be the best in the world, but completely legally and without the physical skills he once had.The wickets he took in the National T20 Cup arent that much more than what he took in 2015 for Worcester. The difference is, he now believes he can bowl that well every time he plays, and that he deserves to play for Pakistan again.Pakistan have just announced their T20 squad to play West Indies. Ajmal was not in it. Very soon they will pick their ODI squad as well. This may not be his last chance, but at 39, with only a handful of T20s against his name in the last six months, he probably wont get many more.It took 13 years for him and Pakistan to believe in him the first time. Now he doesnt have that time. He needs it now. One last shot.He believes he will take it, or as he puts it, If I get to play, you will see me as No. 1 in no time.When Ajmal believes, history has shown us he is a force. But now what he believes doesnt matter. Its whether Pakistan believes.* 15:32:41 GMT, September 28, 2016: The article originally said four, not six ' ' '